<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rand Fishkin &amp; The Troll Defense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/08/06/rand-fishkin-the-troll-defense/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/08/06/rand-fishkin-the-troll-defense/</link>
	<description>Smackdown!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:20:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: *Proof* That The New SEOmoz Tools Is At Least Half Accurate &#124; Smackdown!</title>
		<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/08/06/rand-fishkin-the-troll-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-52234</link>
		<dc:creator>*Proof* That The New SEOmoz Tools Is At Least Half Accurate &#124; Smackdown!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 12:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/08/06/rand-fishkin-the-troll-defense/#comment-52234</guid>
		<description>[...] I did. Now, I know, I may have voiced some opinions in the past as to my doubt of the sincerity of Rand Fishkin and the folks who run things over at SEOmoz, but regardless of what I said before, for me seeing is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #E4E8EB;">
<p>[...] I did. Now, I know, I may have voiced some opinions in the past as to my doubt of the sincerity of Rand Fishkin and the folks who run things over at SEOmoz, but regardless of what I said before, for me seeing is [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/08/06/rand-fishkin-the-troll-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-52171</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 05:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/08/06/rand-fishkin-the-troll-defense/#comment-52171</guid>
		<description>What happened in the end? This is the best blog page i&#039;ve read!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happened in the end? This is the best blog page i&#8217;ve read!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEOmoz Decision Making Flowchart</title>
		<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/08/06/rand-fishkin-the-troll-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-31855</link>
		<dc:creator>SEOmoz Decision Making Flowchart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 18:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/08/06/rand-fishkin-the-troll-defense/#comment-31855</guid>
		<description>[...] pattern has been discussed before by myself and several others in the SEO community, but until today, I never realized it was actually a part of a written plan! I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #E4E8EB;">
<p>[...] pattern has been discussed before by myself and several others in the SEO community, but until today, I never realized it was actually a part of a written plan! I [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No, Just Lying About It Is NOT Effective Reputation Management &#124; Smackdown!</title>
		<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/08/06/rand-fishkin-the-troll-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-6893</link>
		<dc:creator>No, Just Lying About It Is NOT Effective Reputation Management &#124; Smackdown!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 02:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/08/06/rand-fishkin-the-troll-defense/#comment-6893</guid>
		<description>[...] words and obfuscating the issues would prove his point. It was extremely similar to the tactic that Rand Fishkin used the following year when confronted about his own words, with one very clear distinction&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #E4E8EB;">
<p>[...] words and obfuscating the issues would prove his point. It was extremely similar to the tactic that Rand Fishkin used the following year when confronted about his own words, with one very clear distinction&#8230; [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael VanDeMar</title>
		<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/08/06/rand-fishkin-the-troll-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-3867</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael VanDeMar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/08/06/rand-fishkin-the-troll-defense/#comment-3867</guid>
		<description>Nate, for one, you are replying to an almost 9 month old post. Yes, the ranking data has changed since then, and correct, at this time Aviva does not show sitelinks.

The bit you posted about sitelinks always being there for a company is &quot;of course&quot; just plain wrong, that never has been true. It does in fact indicate a certain amount of authority, ranking power, juice, whatever you want to call it, that simply is &lt;em&gt;only&lt;/em&gt; there for a select number of websites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nate, for one, you are replying to an almost 9 month old post. Yes, the ranking data has changed since then, and correct, at this time Aviva does not show sitelinks.</p>
<p>The bit you posted about sitelinks always being there for a company is &#8220;of course&#8221; just plain wrong, that never has been true. It does in fact indicate a certain amount of authority, ranking power, juice, whatever you want to call it, that simply is <em>only</em> there for a select number of websites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/08/06/rand-fishkin-the-troll-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-3864</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/08/06/rand-fishkin-the-troll-defense/#comment-3864</guid>
		<description>Of COURSE if you type in a company name or website you will see the site links below it...that doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s an authority site - that&#039;s just how Google responds when you type in a specific known entity. BTW if you check again you&#039;ll see that the site links for &quot;aviva directory&quot; are gone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of COURSE if you type in a company name or website you will see the site links below it&#8230;that doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s an authority site &#8211; that&#8217;s just how Google responds when you type in a specific known entity. BTW if you check again you&#8217;ll see that the site links for &#8220;aviva directory&#8221; are gone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rand Fishkin Chooses Between Putting Up and Shutting Up - Guess Which He Chose? &#124; Smackdown!</title>
		<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/08/06/rand-fishkin-the-troll-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-623</link>
		<dc:creator>Rand Fishkin Chooses Between Putting Up and Shutting Up - Guess Which He Chose? &#124; Smackdown!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 23:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/08/06/rand-fishkin-the-troll-defense/#comment-623</guid>
		<description>[...] I refrained from being involved in the discussion with Rand, or even blogging about it, lest he use The Troll Defense as an exit strategy yet again. Finally, Yuri basically told him to put up or shut up. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #E4E8EB;">
<p>[...] I refrained from being involved in the discussion with Rand, or even blogging about it, lest he use The Troll Defense as an exit strategy yet again. Finally, Yuri basically told him to put up or shut up. [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WBW (Worldwide Blog Wrestling) Presents&#8230; &#187; Why SEOmoz Needs A &#8220;For Entertainment Purposes Only&#8221; Disclaimer</title>
		<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/08/06/rand-fishkin-the-troll-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>WBW (Worldwide Blog Wrestling) Presents&#8230; &#187; Why SEOmoz Needs A &#8220;For Entertainment Purposes Only&#8221; Disclaimer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 12:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/08/06/rand-fishkin-the-troll-defense/#comment-94</guid>
		<description>[...] get around to doing that, since Rand decided shortly thereafter to retreat completely behind his troll defense, and quit answering questions altogether (regardless of who asked him and despite what he claimed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #E4E8EB;">
<p>[...] get around to doing that, since Rand decided shortly thereafter to retreat completely behind his troll defense, and quit answering questions altogether (regardless of who asked him and despite what he claimed [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Tribute to Sphinn &#8224; Hamlet Batista dot Com</title>
		<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/08/06/rand-fishkin-the-troll-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>A Tribute to Sphinn &#8224; Hamlet Batista dot Com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 01:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/08/06/rand-fishkin-the-troll-defense/#comment-93</guid>
		<description>[...] his FeedBurner counter must be broken: it says he has only 2 readers! I came across his blog when he was ranting about Rand&#8217;s post involving Aviva&#8217;s directory. He covers some really interesting and controversial stuff. Check out his blog and subscribe to his [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #E4E8EB;">
<p>[...] his FeedBurner counter must be broken: it says he has only 2 readers! I came across his blog when he was ranting about Rand&rsquo;s post involving Aviva&rsquo;s directory. He covers some really interesting and controversial stuff. Check out his blog and subscribe to his [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skitzzo</title>
		<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/08/06/rand-fishkin-the-troll-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>Skitzzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 02:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/08/06/rand-fishkin-the-troll-defense/#comment-85</guid>
		<description>Rand, one MAJOR question I have after reading your response here is this: If you believe the best way to determine whether Aviva passes value is to buy links and see if the links help, why in the world wouldn&#039;t you have done so BEFORE blasting Aviva? Wouldn&#039;t that have been the responsible thing to do?

The fact that you hadn&#039;t before writing this piece is VERY surprising to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rand, one MAJOR question I have after reading your response here is this: If you believe the best way to determine whether Aviva passes value is to buy links and see if the links help, why in the world wouldn&#8217;t you have done so BEFORE blasting Aviva? Wouldn&#8217;t that have been the responsible thing to do?</p>
<p>The fact that you hadn&#8217;t before writing this piece is VERY surprising to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

