<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why SEOmoz Needs A &#8220;For Entertainment  Purposes Only&#8221; Disclaimer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/09/21/why-seomoz-needs-a-for-entertainment-purposes-only-disclaimer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/09/21/why-seomoz-needs-a-for-entertainment-purposes-only-disclaimer/</link>
	<description>Smackdown!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 03:20:10 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael VanDeMar</title>
		<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/09/21/why-seomoz-needs-a-for-entertainment-purposes-only-disclaimer/comment-page-1/#comment-5656</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael VanDeMar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 18:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/09/21/why-seomoz-needs-a-for-entertainment-purposes-only-disclaimer/#comment-5656</guid>
		<description>@Shiek - um, no. Wth is with the Myspace type link request? Does that ever actually work for you?

Did someone pay you good money to spam me with that, btw?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Shiek &#8211; um, no. Wth is with the Myspace type link request? Does that ever actually work for you?</p>
<p>Did someone pay you good money to spam me with that, btw?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheik</title>
		<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/09/21/why-seomoz-needs-a-for-entertainment-purposes-only-disclaimer/comment-page-1/#comment-5604</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 15:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/09/21/why-seomoz-needs-a-for-entertainment-purposes-only-disclaimer/#comment-5604</guid>
		<description>hi u&#039;ve a nice blog........Link me back........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi u&#8217;ve a nice blog&#8230;&#8230;..Link me back&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WBW (Worldwide Blog Wrestling) Presents&#8230; &#187; We&#8217;re Saved! Rand Fishkin Gonna Tell Google How It Is!</title>
		<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/09/21/why-seomoz-needs-a-for-entertainment-purposes-only-disclaimer/comment-page-1/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>WBW (Worldwide Blog Wrestling) Presents&#8230; &#187; We&#8217;re Saved! Rand Fishkin Gonna Tell Google How It Is!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 02:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/09/21/why-seomoz-needs-a-for-entertainment-purposes-only-disclaimer/#comment-123</guid>
		<description>[...] in the wake of Rand screwing up yet again, a bright shining ray of hope has at last emerged. No more must we webmasters huddle in fear of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the wake of Rand screwing up yet again, a bright shining ray of hope has at last emerged. No more must we webmasters huddle in fear of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rand Fiskin is Oprah &#187; SEO Factor</title>
		<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/09/21/why-seomoz-needs-a-for-entertainment-purposes-only-disclaimer/comment-page-1/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>Rand Fiskin is Oprah &#187; SEO Factor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 19:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/09/21/why-seomoz-needs-a-for-entertainment-purposes-only-disclaimer/#comment-114</guid>
		<description>[...] and directories are definitely not fans of Fishkin, however. They are poking at him post after post after post after [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and directories are definitely not fans of Fishkin, however. They are poking at him post after post after post after [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rand &#38; SEOmoz: Unprofessional and Irresponsible Actions : SEO Refugee Blog - Search Engine Optimization Information</title>
		<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/09/21/why-seomoz-needs-a-for-entertainment-purposes-only-disclaimer/comment-page-1/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>Rand &#38; SEOmoz: Unprofessional and Irresponsible Actions : SEO Refugee Blog - Search Engine Optimization Information</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 15:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/09/21/why-seomoz-needs-a-for-entertainment-purposes-only-disclaimer/#comment-109</guid>
		<description>[...] couple of months later, Michael once again criticized SEOmoz in a post which once again, became popular on Sphinn. The content of the post was certainly [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] couple of months later, Michael once again criticized SEOmoz in a post which once again, became popular on Sphinn. The content of the post was certainly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cre8tive Flow &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Are Search Engine Marketing Bloggers Held to a Higher Standard?</title>
		<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/09/21/why-seomoz-needs-a-for-entertainment-purposes-only-disclaimer/comment-page-1/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>Cre8tive Flow &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Are Search Engine Marketing Bloggers Held to a Higher Standard?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 19:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/09/21/why-seomoz-needs-a-for-entertainment-purposes-only-disclaimer/#comment-100</guid>
		<description>[...] It became a trigger for Smackdown&#8217;s Michael VanDeMar, who wrote in his blog, Why SEOmoz Needs A “For Entertainment Purposes Only” Disclaimer. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It became a trigger for Smackdown&#8217;s Michael VanDeMar, who wrote in his blog, Why SEOmoz Needs A “For Entertainment Purposes Only” Disclaimer. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WBW (Worldwide Blog Wrestling) Presents&#8230; &#187; Why Rand Is Wrong About The &#8216;Twelve Attributes&#8217;, Part 2 - The Touchy-Feely Version</title>
		<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/09/21/why-seomoz-needs-a-for-entertainment-purposes-only-disclaimer/comment-page-1/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>WBW (Worldwide Blog Wrestling) Presents&#8230; &#187; Why Rand Is Wrong About The &#8216;Twelve Attributes&#8217;, Part 2 - The Touchy-Feely Version</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 21:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/09/21/why-seomoz-needs-a-for-entertainment-purposes-only-disclaimer/#comment-98</guid>
		<description>[...] golly gee whillikers! It looks like I stepped on a toe or two! My bad. Time out! Take backs [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] golly gee whillikers! It looks like I stepped on a toe or two! My bad. Time out! Take backs [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to fail at blogging</title>
		<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/09/21/why-seomoz-needs-a-for-entertainment-purposes-only-disclaimer/comment-page-1/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>How to fail at blogging</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 19:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/09/21/why-seomoz-needs-a-for-entertainment-purposes-only-disclaimer/#comment-96</guid>
		<description>[...] how badly they affect your site, but again, it would be a subjective list. I will start by saying I visited a site today that had a very pointed message, followed by an annoying message asking me to register to comment. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] how badly they affect your site, but again, it would be a subjective list. I will start by saying I visited a site today that had a very pointed message, followed by an annoying message asking me to register to comment. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search Engine Roundtable</title>
		<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/09/21/why-seomoz-needs-a-for-entertainment-purposes-only-disclaimer/comment-page-1/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>Search Engine Roundtable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 13:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/09/21/why-seomoz-needs-a-for-entertainment-purposes-only-disclaimer/#comment-95</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;What Makes a Bad Web Directory?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Yesterday, Rand Fishkin came out with a SEOmoz article on what makes a good web directory versus a bad one. Some of his points were that manipulative directories may have the following characteristics: are too broad, allows everyone access, uses......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>What Makes a Bad Web Directory?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Yesterday, Rand Fishkin came out with a SEOmoz article on what makes a good web directory versus a bad one. Some of his points were that manipulative directories may have the following characteristics: are too broad, allows everyone access, uses&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
