<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Did Matt Cutts Say It Is Illogical To Think Google Would Penalize Sites Just For Buying Links?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/12/02/did-matt-cutts-say-it-is-illogical-to-think-google-would-penalize-sites-just-for-buying-links/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/12/02/did-matt-cutts-say-it-is-illogical-to-think-google-would-penalize-sites-just-for-buying-links/</link>
	<description>Smackdown!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:05:03 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sitelinks at #60 - A Warning Shot From Google &#124; Smackdown!</title>
		<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/12/02/did-matt-cutts-say-it-is-illogical-to-think-google-would-penalize-sites-just-for-buying-links/comment-page-1/#comment-3785</link>
		<dc:creator>Sitelinks at #60 - A Warning Shot From Google &#124; Smackdown!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 07:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/12/02/did-matt-cutts-say-it-is-illogical-to-think-google-would-penalize-sites-just-for-buying-links/#comment-3785</guid>
		<description>[...] year, when he stated that assuming a site shouldn&#8217;t rank just because it buys paid links is committing a logical fallacy (ie. just because they buy paid links doesn&#8217;t mean Google will penalize them), but of course [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] year, when he stated that assuming a site shouldn&#8217;t rank just because it buys paid links is committing a logical fallacy (ie. just because they buy paid links doesn&#8217;t mean Google will penalize them), but of course [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search Engine Roundtable</title>
		<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/12/02/did-matt-cutts-say-it-is-illogical-to-think-google-would-penalize-sites-just-for-buying-links/comment-page-1/#comment-849</link>
		<dc:creator>Search Engine Roundtable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 14:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/12/02/did-matt-cutts-say-it-is-illogical-to-think-google-would-penalize-sites-just-for-buying-links/#comment-849</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Matt Cutts Clarifies Recent PageRank Drops &amp; Link Buying...&lt;/strong&gt;

Matt Cutts recently spoke with Rand Fishkin of SEOmoz and made a few interesting statements that elicited some interesting forum response. First, WebmasterWorld members were particularly interested in this statement: we did do a full PageRank update se...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Matt Cutts Clarifies Recent PageRank Drops &#38; Link Buying&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Matt Cutts recently spoke with Rand Fishkin of SEOmoz and made a few interesting statements that elicited some interesting forum response. First, WebmasterWorld members were particularly interested in this statement: we did do a full PageRank update se&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DazzlinDonna</title>
		<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/12/02/did-matt-cutts-say-it-is-illogical-to-think-google-would-penalize-sites-just-for-buying-links/comment-page-1/#comment-835</link>
		<dc:creator>DazzlinDonna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 17:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2007/12/02/did-matt-cutts-say-it-is-illogical-to-think-google-would-penalize-sites-just-for-buying-links/#comment-835</guid>
		<description>As I&#039;ve told you privately about this, I believe my &quot;guess&quot; (and that&#039;s what it is) is no worse than your &quot;guess&quot; (and that&#039;s what I believe yours is as well).  I don&#039;t accept that your so-called &quot;facts&quot; are in fact &quot;facts&quot; but I also don&#039;t have any facts of my own to counter you with.  All I can say is...maybe...maybe not.  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I&#8217;ve told you privately about this, I believe my &#8220;guess&#8221; (and that&#8217;s what it is) is no worse than your &#8220;guess&#8221; (and that&#8217;s what I believe yours is as well).  I don&#8217;t accept that your so-called &#8220;facts&#8221; are in fact &#8220;facts&#8221; but I also don&#8217;t have any facts of my own to counter you with.  All I can say is&#8230;maybe&#8230;maybe not.  <img src='http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
