<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Reconsideration Request Language Modified Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2008/02/21/google-reconsideration-request-language-modified-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2008/02/21/google-reconsideration-request-language-modified-again/</link>
	<description>Smackdown!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 03:20:10 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Google Reconsideration or Reinclusion Request &#124; Andy Beard - Niche Marketing</title>
		<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2008/02/21/google-reconsideration-request-language-modified-again/comment-page-1/#comment-2023</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Reconsideration or Reinclusion Request &#124; Andy Beard - Niche Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2008/02/21/google-reconsideration-request-language-modified-again/#comment-2023</guid>
		<description>[...] Google have changed their wording for reconsideration requests (formerly reinclusion requests), I have filed one for this domain. (note to Google, why isn&#039;t [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google have changed their wording for reconsideration requests (formerly reinclusion requests), I have filed one for this domain. (note to Google, why isn&#39;t [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search Engine Land: News About Search Engines &#38; Search Marketing</title>
		<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2008/02/21/google-reconsideration-request-language-modified-again/comment-page-1/#comment-2011</link>
		<dc:creator>Search Engine Land: News About Search Engines &#38; Search Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2008/02/21/google-reconsideration-request-language-modified-again/#comment-2011</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;SearchCap: The Day In Search, February 25, 2008...&lt;/strong&gt;

Below is what happened in search today, as reported on Search Engine Land and from other places across the web.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>SearchCap: The Day In Search, February 25, 2008&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Below is what happened in search today, as reported on Search Engine Land and from other places across the web&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search Engine Roundtable</title>
		<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2008/02/21/google-reconsideration-request-language-modified-again/comment-page-1/#comment-2008</link>
		<dc:creator>Search Engine Roundtable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2008/02/21/google-reconsideration-request-language-modified-again/#comment-2008</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Google Reconsideration Request Language Modified...&lt;/strong&gt;

Michael VanDeMar noticed in his blog that Google has changed the language of their reconsideration request language to something a little less &quot;accusatory.&quot; The previous wording said that &quot;I believe this site has violated Google’s quality guidelin...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Google Reconsideration Request Language Modified&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Michael VanDeMar noticed in his blog that Google has changed the language of their reconsideration request language to something a little less &#8220;accusatory.&#8221; The previous wording said that &#8220;I believe this site has violated Google’s quality guidelin&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bwelford</title>
		<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2008/02/21/google-reconsideration-request-language-modified-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1978</link>
		<dc:creator>bwelford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 17:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2008/02/21/google-reconsideration-request-language-modified-again/#comment-1978</guid>
		<description>Congratulations to all.  It&#039;s great to see a relatively speedy and customer-sensitive response from Google.  So often, they don&#039;t seem to have the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations to all.  It&#8217;s great to see a relatively speedy and customer-sensitive response from Google.  So often, they don&#8217;t seem to have the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
