<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Suggests Disabled Dating Clubs For Cheap Dates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2008/07/29/google-suggests-disabled-dating-clubs-for-cheap-dates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2008/07/29/google-suggests-disabled-dating-clubs-for-cheap-dates/</link>
	<description>Smackdown!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 03:45:59 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: seobro</title>
		<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2008/07/29/google-suggests-disabled-dating-clubs-for-cheap-dates/comment-page-1/#comment-10327</link>
		<dc:creator>seobro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 12:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/?p=88#comment-10327</guid>
		<description>I imagine that you get brids at low prices because they are in wheelchairs, but pushing a wheelchair around gets old real fast.

BTW in some countries the going rate is 40 goats - BAAAAD joke!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I imagine that you get brids at low prices because they are in wheelchairs, but pushing a wheelchair around gets old real fast.</p>
<p>BTW in some countries the going rate is 40 goats &#8211; BAAAAD joke!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael VanDeMar</title>
		<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2008/07/29/google-suggests-disabled-dating-clubs-for-cheap-dates/comment-page-1/#comment-10321</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael VanDeMar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/?p=88#comment-10321</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;P.s. You captcha is the worst I’ve ever seen.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

@Baylow - Worst in what way? There are plenty of extremely crappy CAPTCHA&#039;s out there... mine is tons better than most of the hard to crack ones.

As to the matching, you&#039;re just wrong on that one. I promise you that Pronto did not bid on [cookies disabled], any more than Ebay did on [black people] last year. 

@AK Works - Yeah, Google manually got rid of most of the offensive ones after the last fuss. I&#039;m guessing that the only reason that any might get through would be due to this whole &quot;previous query&quot; matching thing that they are doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>P.s. You captcha is the worst I’ve ever seen.</p></blockquote>
<p>@Baylow &#8211; Worst in what way? There are plenty of extremely crappy CAPTCHA&#8217;s out there&#8230; mine is tons better than most of the hard to crack ones.</p>
<p>As to the matching, you&#8217;re just wrong on that one. I promise you that Pronto did not bid on [cookies disabled], any more than Ebay did on [black people] last year. </p>
<p>@AK Works &#8211; Yeah, Google manually got rid of most of the offensive ones after the last fuss. I&#8217;m guessing that the only reason that any might get through would be due to this whole &#8220;previous query&#8221; matching thing that they are doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baylow</title>
		<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2008/07/29/google-suggests-disabled-dating-clubs-for-cheap-dates/comment-page-1/#comment-10320</link>
		<dc:creator>Baylow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/?p=88#comment-10320</guid>
		<description>P.s. You captcha is the worst I&#039;ve ever seen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.s. You captcha is the worst I&#8217;ve ever seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AK Works</title>
		<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2008/07/29/google-suggests-disabled-dating-clubs-for-cheap-dates/comment-page-1/#comment-10319</link>
		<dc:creator>AK Works</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/?p=88#comment-10319</guid>
		<description>Years ago, I did a search for &quot;blood diamonds&quot; and found a Google AdWords selling &quot;blood diamonds&quot;. It was not the coolest thing to see at all. I talked about it on SEW and I think Threadwatch.org picked it up for some discussion. That was 3 years ago or so. Guess this is still going on more less</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Years ago, I did a search for &#8220;blood diamonds&#8221; and found a Google AdWords selling &#8220;blood diamonds&#8221;. It was not the coolest thing to see at all. I talked about it on SEW and I think Threadwatch.org picked it up for some discussion. That was 3 years ago or so. Guess this is still going on more less</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baylow</title>
		<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2008/07/29/google-suggests-disabled-dating-clubs-for-cheap-dates/comment-page-1/#comment-10318</link>
		<dc:creator>Baylow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/?p=88#comment-10318</guid>
		<description>1) &quot;Obviously just slopping broad match targeting on their end, coupled with the fact that with AdWords you can insert a token in your ads, and include the actual phrase the person was searching on.&quot;

Incorrect - AdWords uses the {KeyWord:Default} tag to input the keyword that you are buying, not the keyword (or search query) that is being searched. So pronto is buying that keyword (not broad matching to it)

2) Those dating services are probably buying the term &quot;dates&quot; or &quot;date&quot; and bidding higher than say EHarmony or another dating service. This is not a Google fault, but a advertiser misunderstanding how to use AdWords.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) &#8220;Obviously just slopping broad match targeting on their end, coupled with the fact that with AdWords you can insert a token in your ads, and include the actual phrase the person was searching on.&#8221;</p>
<p>Incorrect &#8211; AdWords uses the {KeyWord:Default} tag to input the keyword that you are buying, not the keyword (or search query) that is being searched. So pronto is buying that keyword (not broad matching to it)</p>
<p>2) Those dating services are probably buying the term &#8220;dates&#8221; or &#8220;date&#8221; and bidding higher than say EHarmony or another dating service. This is not a Google fault, but a advertiser misunderstanding how to use AdWords.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
