<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Tries Too Hard To Appear Useful, Starts Making Up New Words</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2008/11/18/google-tries-too-hard-to-appear-useful-starts-making-up-new-words/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2008/11/18/google-tries-too-hard-to-appear-useful-starts-making-up-new-words/</link>
	<description>Smackdown!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:20:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent Davidson</title>
		<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2008/11/18/google-tries-too-hard-to-appear-useful-starts-making-up-new-words/comment-page-1/#comment-13421</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent Davidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 20:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/?p=170#comment-13421</guid>
		<description>Nah - they use a simple algorithm which concatenates dictionary words together:

bumpnutterfrund

BUMP NUTTER FRUND
BUMP UTTER FUND

Completely meaningless (and yes, produces no results) but each term they finally suggested is a real word. &quot;Nutter&quot; is slang, so probably not suggested, and &quot;Frund&quot;, uh, no. 

In a way, smart, as most web domains started off this way.

http://www.bumpnutterfrund.com/

Nice test!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nah &#8211; they use a simple algorithm which concatenates dictionary words together:</p>
<p>bumpnutterfrund</p>
<p>BUMP NUTTER FRUND<br />
BUMP UTTER FUND</p>
<p>Completely meaningless (and yes, produces no results) but each term they finally suggested is a real word. &#8220;Nutter&#8221; is slang, so probably not suggested, and &#8220;Frund&#8221;, uh, no. </p>
<p>In a way, smart, as most web domains started off this way.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bumpnutterfrund.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.bumpnutterfrund.com/</a></p>
<p>Nice test!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seobro</title>
		<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2008/11/18/google-tries-too-hard-to-appear-useful-starts-making-up-new-words/comment-page-1/#comment-10546</link>
		<dc:creator>seobro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 15:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/?p=170#comment-10546</guid>
		<description>I typed in &quot;V!^@RA&quot; and got a link to visual resources...

So that&#039;s where all the spam has been coming from. LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I typed in &#8220;V!^@RA&#8221; and got a link to visual resources&#8230;</p>
<p>So that&#8217;s where all the spam has been coming from. LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gab Goldenberg</title>
		<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2008/11/18/google-tries-too-hard-to-appear-useful-starts-making-up-new-words/comment-page-1/#comment-10537</link>
		<dc:creator>Gab Goldenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 17:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/?p=170#comment-10537</guid>
		<description>Amusing find, Mike. If I had to guess, I&#039;d say Google cut up the word into chunks, saw the frund was maybe a so-called &#039;fat finder&#039; typo (e.g. hitting two keys at once - f and r) and you meant &#039;fund&#039;, not &#039;frund&#039;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amusing find, Mike. If I had to guess, I&#8217;d say Google cut up the word into chunks, saw the frund was maybe a so-called &#8216;fat finder&#8217; typo (e.g. hitting two keys at once &#8211; f and r) and you meant &#8216;fund&#8217;, not &#8216;frund&#8217;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suze Ingram</title>
		<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2008/11/18/google-tries-too-hard-to-appear-useful-starts-making-up-new-words/comment-page-1/#comment-10532</link>
		<dc:creator>Suze Ingram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 06:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/?p=170#comment-10532</guid>
		<description>Wow! That really is silly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! That really is silly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tad Miller</title>
		<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2008/11/18/google-tries-too-hard-to-appear-useful-starts-making-up-new-words/comment-page-1/#comment-10525</link>
		<dc:creator>Tad Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/?p=170#comment-10525</guid>
		<description>I would bet money that the spelling suggestions are from a database of actual search queries that Google has seen before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would bet money that the spelling suggestions are from a database of actual search queries that Google has seen before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnMu</title>
		<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2008/11/18/google-tries-too-hard-to-appear-useful-starts-making-up-new-words/comment-page-1/#comment-10523</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnMu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/?p=170#comment-10523</guid>
		<description>Most software spell checkers are not tied to official sources -- they&#039;re based on statistical analysis. That said, I have no idea how it works out in this particular case :-), it does seem a bit strange (as does your query :-))... If you&#039;re interested, there&#039;s a pretty neat posting about spell checkers by Peter Norvig (from Google) at http://norvig.com/spell-correct.html (where he explains how a spell checker written in 21 lines of Python works).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most software spell checkers are not tied to official sources &#8212; they&#8217;re based on statistical analysis. That said, I have no idea how it works out in this particular case <img src='http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> , it does seem a bit strange (as does your query <img src='http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> )&#8230; If you&#8217;re interested, there&#8217;s a pretty neat posting about spell checkers by Peter Norvig (from Google) at <a href="http://norvig.com/spell-correct.html" rel="nofollow">http://norvig.com/spell-correct.html</a> (where he explains how a spell checker written in 21 lines of Python works).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yura</title>
		<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2008/11/18/google-tries-too-hard-to-appear-useful-starts-making-up-new-words/comment-page-1/#comment-10522</link>
		<dc:creator>Yura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 05:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/?p=170#comment-10522</guid>
		<description>It is a new strategy to increase the AdWords market. Imagine someone typos, Google suggests a non-existing word and someone attaches meaning to the word. For example, &lt;strong&gt;bumput&lt;noscript&gt;boggle&lt;/noscript&gt;terfund&lt;/strong&gt; may as well mean &quot;A suggestion of Google to search for a non-existing word&quot; or &quot;Another screw up by Google&quot; or &quot;The fund for bump-challenged putters&quot;. People start writing articles, selling stuff, showing AdSense, visitors click on them or others might even buy Ad Words. Voila, more money to Google.

Now add the scale of typos and possible new words and you get the Googolistic scale of profit :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a new strategy to increase the AdWords market. Imagine someone typos, Google suggests a non-existing word and someone attaches meaning to the word. For example, <strong>bumput<noscript>boggle</noscript>terfund</strong> may as well mean &#8220;A suggestion of Google to search for a non-existing word&#8221; or &#8220;Another screw up by Google&#8221; or &#8220;The fund for bump-challenged putters&#8221;. People start writing articles, selling stuff, showing AdSense, visitors click on them or others might even buy Ad Words. Voila, more money to Google.</p>
<p>Now add the scale of typos and possible new words and you get the Googolistic scale of profit <img src='http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

