<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Web Search Goes Completely AJAX</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2009/01/30/google-web-search-goes-completely-ajax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2009/01/30/google-web-search-goes-completely-ajax/</link>
	<description>Smackdown!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:20:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seo Toronto</title>
		<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2009/01/30/google-web-search-goes-completely-ajax/comment-page-1/#comment-54884</link>
		<dc:creator>Seo Toronto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 14:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/?p=244#comment-54884</guid>
		<description>old news but I hate the google ajax.. its so annoying the way it works and is distracting. The reason everyone loves google is simple interface giving results. They should keep it that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>old news but I hate the google ajax.. its so annoying the way it works and is distracting. The reason everyone loves google is simple interface giving results. They should keep it that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reg Charie - NBS-SEO</title>
		<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2009/01/30/google-web-search-goes-completely-ajax/comment-page-1/#comment-52301</link>
		<dc:creator>Reg Charie - NBS-SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 03:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/?p=244#comment-52301</guid>
		<description>Pavlicko Says:
&quot;I really don’t understand why google would do this, other than to purposely affect rank checking devices ....&quot;

DOH!. Give the man a cigar. 
One of the MAJOR guidelines is &quot;Do not use automated routines to access our data.&quot; 

If this is designed to stop what must be untold CPU cycles, I say go for it. 
Reducing the loads imposed by automated analytics can only make their system faster. 

Faster! Better! Stronger! .... Tool Man Taylor&#039;s grunt &quot;Arr Arr Arr.&quot; &quot;More Power!&quot;

best,
Reg
nbs-seo.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pavlicko Says:<br />
&#8220;I really don’t understand why google would do this, other than to purposely affect rank checking devices &#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p>DOH!. Give the man a cigar.<br />
One of the MAJOR guidelines is &#8220;Do not use automated routines to access our data.&#8221; </p>
<p>If this is designed to stop what must be untold CPU cycles, I say go for it.<br />
Reducing the loads imposed by automated analytics can only make their system faster. </p>
<p>Faster! Better! Stronger! &#8230;. Tool Man Taylor&#8217;s grunt &#8220;Arr Arr Arr.&#8221; &#8220;More Power!&#8221;</p>
<p>best,<br />
Reg<br />
nbs-seo.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Track SEO rankings and Sitelinks with Google Analytics II</title>
		<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2009/01/30/google-web-search-goes-completely-ajax/comment-page-1/#comment-24181</link>
		<dc:creator>Track SEO rankings and Sitelinks with Google Analytics II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 21:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/?p=244#comment-24181</guid>
		<description>[...] a while Google is testing a new AJAX version of their search engine. I&#039;m not sure who&#039;s seeing the AJAX version and who isn&#039;t, but in Holland [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #E4E8EB;">
<p>[...] a while Google is testing a new AJAX version of their search engine. I&#8217;m not sure who&#8217;s seeing the AJAX version and who isn&#8217;t, but in Holland [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2009/01/30/google-web-search-goes-completely-ajax/comment-page-1/#comment-22645</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 16:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/?p=244#comment-22645</guid>
		<description>I’ll have to do some research on this change. Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ll have to do some research on this change. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amir</title>
		<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2009/01/30/google-web-search-goes-completely-ajax/comment-page-1/#comment-21790</link>
		<dc:creator>Amir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 07:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/?p=244#comment-21790</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve also witnessed this change, it broke some javascripts that i worked with. 
I did however found a solution for it and wrote about it in my blog  - bit.ly/BunTi  hope it will also help you.

Amir</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve also witnessed this change, it broke some javascripts that i worked with.<br />
I did however found a solution for it and wrote about it in my blog  &#8211; bit.ly/BunTi  hope it will also help you.</p>
<p>Amir</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bilety lotnicze</title>
		<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2009/01/30/google-web-search-goes-completely-ajax/comment-page-1/#comment-20655</link>
		<dc:creator>Bilety lotnicze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 21:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/?p=244#comment-20655</guid>
		<description>Good you noticed. I’ll have to do some research on this as I use a lot of ajax on my pages. It definitely seems like there is some issues with this especially when it comes to SEO..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good you noticed. I’ll have to do some research on this as I use a lot of ajax on my pages. It definitely seems like there is some issues with this especially when it comes to SEO..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toronto SEO</title>
		<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2009/01/30/google-web-search-goes-completely-ajax/comment-page-1/#comment-17990</link>
		<dc:creator>Toronto SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 18:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/?p=244#comment-17990</guid>
		<description>interesting completely Ajax, not a big fan of Ajax at all wonder how many people really like Ajax? or am I the only one?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting completely Ajax, not a big fan of Ajax at all wonder how many people really like Ajax? or am I the only one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The sky is falling again&#8230;Google&#8217;s serving search results using AJAX! &#124; Web Design and Web Development for Barrie, Simcoe County and the World.</title>
		<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2009/01/30/google-web-search-goes-completely-ajax/comment-page-1/#comment-12589</link>
		<dc:creator>The sky is falling again&#8230;Google&#8217;s serving search results using AJAX! &#124; Web Design and Web Development for Barrie, Simcoe County and the World.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/?p=244#comment-12589</guid>
		<description>[...] claims that this is strictly experimental and affecting a small number of users, but from the buzz I&#8217;ve heard, there are many people who have experienced the new [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #E4E8EB;">
<p>[...] claims that this is strictly experimental and affecting a small number of users, but from the buzz I&#8217;ve heard, there are many people who have experienced the new [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Universal search will take over &#124; searchlightseo.com</title>
		<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2009/01/30/google-web-search-goes-completely-ajax/comment-page-1/#comment-12201</link>
		<dc:creator>Universal search will take over &#124; searchlightseo.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/?p=244#comment-12201</guid>
		<description>[...] the top result form each and display on page. This might not be so far out when you factor in that Google have started using Ajax in search results. This is not currently widespread and is just in testing as it only crops up very occaisionally in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #E4E8EB;">
<p>[...] the top result form each and display on page. This might not be so far out when you factor in that Google have started using Ajax in search results. This is not currently widespread and is just in testing as it only crops up very occaisionally in [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael VanDeMar</title>
		<link>http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/2009/01/30/google-web-search-goes-completely-ajax/comment-page-1/#comment-12168</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael VanDeMar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smackdown.blogsblogsblogs.com/?p=244#comment-12168</guid>
		<description>Austin, it was only in certain browser versions and from certain parts of the country. Firefox updated their browser to a newer version so it is appearing in the logs much less often. Plus they may have cut way back on testing it due to all the attention it generated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Austin, it was only in certain browser versions and from certain parts of the country. Firefox updated their browser to a newer version so it is appearing in the logs much less often. Plus they may have cut way back on testing it due to all the attention it generated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

